Actually I am a scientist and a past member of the Oregon Society of Soil Scientists, I have earned over 100 credits in science. I have links from scientific research papers to show all the evidence. Its is ecology meets astrophysics. There are experiments being conducted as I write that will confirm what I say about Galactic Cosmic rays. Just let me know if you want to be in the discovery of a lifetime. You have not declared yourself to me as a scientist of any kind except to say you were on a boat. Darwin was on the Beagle and that is where he came to some brilliant revelations. As for the matches between your vague references about greenhouse gases (a bad term) and CO2, you should clarify as a scientist. There is always going to be Climate Change especially when you explode hundreds of thermonuclear bombs and that is where the big coverup lies. Also CO2 always follows the warming, it does not cause warming, deforestation and ecological disruption causes warming. CO2 is released by dying organisms and upwelling from the Ocean after the warming. If land is denuded it will warm up and CO2 will be released. But if you lack common sense you should not be involved in science. Here is the info you asked about Coccolithophore:Coccoliths are individual plates of calcium carbonate formed by coccolithophores (single-celled algae such as Emiliania huxleyi) which are arranged around them in a coccosphere. Now to answer your question about acidification of the Ocean. When the cyanobateria (blue green alga) dies it descends to the depths to be recycled by bacteria if not eaten by zooplankton. The calcium shell neutralizes the acid effect of CO2. here is a link on the symbiosis of ancient times:https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:ZD4VsaWkm7kJ:dblab.rutgers.edu/home/downloads/Files/Li_et_al%2520MB_06.pdf+&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShALJ8cyUJTr0dgO6Ou6dU8LyRGNqkEP_ItzNOYXaMsHcrStez_my11OcL_di4_Hwlw7M5h8W6XbJ2M6UnvLDPNjhxco6IMwC_ErMEYAfHTpkrB-COUaEm1lRIWm89VlXcAS2rO&sig=AHIEtbQ4-pHCKPTsGvG9qvenaDW4iV8z5g
To disregard the process of photosynthesis of this prominent organism and many others like it in the Ocean is folly. It is the foundation upon which rests the Ecosystem and Biodiversity of the Ocean food web from which depends zooplankton from krill to Whales. Also since the Ocean covers 2/3rds of the planet it is reasonable to assume that it supplies at least an equal proportion of the Oxygen and Carbon recycling. That is where my theory of galactic Cosmic rays comes in,it is well known among commercial fisherman that the best catches occur during periods of low sunspot numbers. But even this cycle was interrupted by the blasts that occurred in the Ocean. I have a lot more information linked to scientific research on all parameters of this subject. My theory is similar to the Gaia theory but it diverges in one important respect: I do not assign any mythological aspect to the planet as a goddess. Also the most important stimulant for Climate Change does not exist on this planet or even the Solar system but lightyears away. I acknowledge of course that Mankind is certainly an agent of Climate change and usually for the worse, that is why I study ecology. But Mankind is only a temporary disturbance, there has and always will be Climate change on this planet with or without Mankind. It is the nature of the Cosmos.