Tunguska Event

Shaidurov explains that the levels of carbon dioxide and methane, the other two greenhouse gases are not the cause behind global warming but the effect of global warming. That this might be so has long been speculated, because global warming seems to have preceded the increase in carbon dioxide and methane. But Shaidurov also explains the mechanism:

"The point is that the average increase of land and ocean temperature produces higher average absolute humidity. In its turn, this raises the assimilation ability of the atmosphere even at constant content of carbon dioxide. But increasing the average ocean temperature is responsible for lower water solubility of carbon dioxide, which then arrives in the atmosphere. Moreover, increase in land temperature is responsible for growth of bogs, at least in Northern Russia, due to the removal of permafrost deep down. The rise in area and activity of bogs leads to more active production of methane. Thus, a self-stimulated process was launched for the increase of average temperature of the Earth's surface. Therefore the rise of greenhouse gas concentration is more a consequence of warming but not a main reason."

Therefore, there exists a positive feedback mechanism at work: the Tunguska Event has changed the distribution of water vapors and ice crystals in the atmosphere (the nature of the clouds) and has started the global warming; global warming produces an increase in the levels of the other greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane, and these in turn also contribute to the increase in global warming. However, the CO2 and the methane are negligible compared to the water vapors. A rise of just 1% of water vapor could raise the global average temperature of Earth's surface more then 4 degrees Celsius.

As Andrew E. Dessler of the Texas A & M University writes in 'The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change': "Human activities do not control all greenhouse gases, however. The most powerful greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is water vapour. Human activities have little direct control over its atmospheric abundance, which is controlled instead by the worldwide balance between evaporation from the oceans and precipitation."

Letter to Oceanus

What I was looking for is research into how Galactic Cosmic Rays may effect the growth and migration of heterotrophic marine bacteria such as Roseobacter class. I have a hunch that if GCR rate is high, this will have a negative effect on the bacteria causing them to migrate away from the surface of the Ocean into the depths. At the same time the Cyanobacteria protected within the calcium shells of the diatoms will not have its DMS products stolen by the bacteria and will reproduce at a much faster rate resulting in blooms. Also the Zooplankton will migrate away from a higher GCR rate so there will be less feeding on Phytoplankton. Altogether my theory states that a higher GCR will result in Phytoplankton blooms and a Cooler planet as a result. But I can not verify this theory without field work that would need to be done, such as quantifying populations of marine bacteria at different times of the day, diurnal migrations, comparisons with populations for different rates of GCR coinciding with Solar activity. I have not been able to find any scientific work done on the GCR effects on bacteria growth. It makes sense that high frequency waves will cause mutations and cell damage to bacteria outside of a calcium shell. I believe this is the key to Climate on planet Earth.

The real danger that you and most people overlook are the consequences of hundreds of Thermonuclear bombs exploded in the Ocean form the fifties to 1996. This series of events changed the Climate and destroyed many ecocsystems in the Ocean destroying the diversity. It is the phytoplankton in the Ocean that determine life on Earth more so than anything on land. Only recently has the phytoplankton begun to recover and if unmolested by oil spills and further nuclear waste, we may survive. CO2 will only let phytoplankton grow faster. You have been duped. The guilty ones have got one over on you. Even now they say nuclear war can Cool the planet. At first it may Cool the planet but with the phytoplankton gone the bacteria will take over and it will go back to the PreCambrian age. These NUKE people are very clever.

I have a candidate called the Cosmic Ray Guy. He is really Cool and he is from Outerspace. Every night he attacks Earth and kills lots of Earthlings with his deadly rays. He shoots a gun with a very high frequency blast. He laughs because he knows you cant shoot back because he is lightyears away. So when its dark and the Sun is quiet he kills billions of bacteria near the surface of the Ocean. But the cyanobacteria in the diatoms are safe even during the day when the Sun is shining. They are protected by the calcium shell of the diatoms floating in the Sea basking in the rays of the Sun. They like Cosmic Ray Guy because he scares away the bacteria which feed off their energy source. Even the Zooplankton have to descend further away when Cosmic Ray guy is around. So the phytoplankton love him and bloom big swirls in the Ocean whenever he is around. That is what makes the world COOL.

Just what are you researching smarty pants? The evidence I'd say is going through your sieve? What do you think a Thermonuclear blast would do to an ecosystem in the Ocean? Seem like you are forgetting some vital facts. Guys like you are like McClellen at the battle of Richmond,its right there in front of you but you can't see it. Maybe its too tiny you need a microscope. Clue they live from top to bottom and are called the "black market economy" of the Ocean. Its not my ego at all but my inquisitive mind, I abhor consensus. My gift to you today: just look at the relationship between marine bacteria and galactic cosmic rays, diurnal & seasonal migration, diatoms, phytoplankton blooms during periods of record catches of fish, there is a lot more if you are curious.What is your theory? Every scientist has one of his own.

Bombs dont help any

Did I fail to mention that exploding thermonuclear bombs in the Pacific Ocean just might have consequences for life on the planet. This might be a cause behind why so many people seek refuge in drugs, sex, food, entertainment, anything to divert their attention from the world coming to an end. The explosion of these Weapons of Mass Destruction has resulted in the ecosystem of the world Ocean being nearly destroyed. The population of diatoms plummeted after the detonations and the bacteria population took its place altering the chemistry and food chain of life itself. Fish populations also plummeted as a result at a time when food supplies are need for a growing human population. Only in the past few years have the diatoms made a surprising comeback as a result of the Sun going quiet. We can not afford to make any more insane mistakes with our planet. Those responsible should be arrested as War Criminals. The present World Government wants to divert the attention from this tremendous assault upon the ecosystem of the planet. There is nothing to compare to the hundreds of Thermonuclear bombs that were unleashed since the madmen of the Atomic Age gained power. They are the Enemy of Humans and life of any kind besides bacteria, ants, scorpions, cockroaches,viruses etc. But that is the point, we at the top will suffer the most if we do not arrest and purge these vipers from the face of the Earth.

Global Cooling

Global Cooling is occurring since the blooms are earlier. This phenomenon has nothing to do with CO2 concentrations but the recovery of the plankton populations after decades of atomic weapon testing. if there are no further tests or oil spills than the fish stocks will also recover. It is obvious that if you destroy the phytoplankton by bombing than the bacteria will take over and suppress the phytoplankton. It takes a long time to recover. if it had not happened the ocean would die and we would go back to precambrian times with little Oxygen to breathe and water would also evaporate leaving a Martian landscape.
Actually the phytoplankton bloom has a lot more to do with cosmic ray flux which is greater in the arctic regions and at this time with low sunspot numbers. A greater cosmic ray flux is devastating to zooplankton which have no calcium carbonate shell to protect against the short wave radiation. So they migrate downward as the phytoplankton go upward in their diatom shells and the population booms. At night the zooplankton feed but the bacteria population is also down so more DMS that is released from feeding escapes to the atmos to form clouds and thus the Cooling commences. that is it in a nutshell, of course the full explanation is much more complex which includes cavitation, ecology, water temperatures, seasonal variations, currents etc.